MDEV-28621 what if we delay actual subquery removal to the end of the optimization phase?
not sure this is the best way to do it, but at least is has the virtue
of being mildly cunning by leaving the actual subquery removal to end of
the optimization phase and untaging something for removal if we walk
into it earlier in the optimization.
MDEV-33551: Semi-sync Wait Point AFTER_COMMIT Slow on Workloads with Heavy Concurrency
When using semi-sync replication with
rpl_semi_sync_master_wait_point=AFTER_COMMIT, the performance of the
primary can significantly reduce compared to AFTER_SYNC's
performance for workloads with many concurrent users executing
transactions. This is because all connections on the primary share
the same cond_wait variable/mutex pair, so any time an ACK is
received from a replica, all waiting connections are awoken to check
if the ACK was for itself, which is done in mutual exclusion.
This patch changes this such that the waiting THD will use its own
local condition variable, and the ACK receiver thread only signals
connections which have been ACKed for wakeup. That is, the
THD::LOCK_wakeup_ready condition variable is re-used for this
purpose, and the Active_tranx queue nodes are extended to hold the
waiting thread, so it can be signalled once ACKed.
Additionally:
1) Removed part of MDEV-11853 additions, which allowed suspended
connection threads awaiting their semi-sync ACKs to live until their
ACKs had been received. This part, however, wasn't needed. That is,
all that was needed was for the Ack_thread to survive. So now the
connection threads are killed during phase 1. Thereby
THD::is_awaiting_semisync_ack, and all its related code was removed.
2) COND_binlog_send is repurposed to signal on the condition when
Active_tranx is emptied during clear_active_tranx_nodes.
3) At master shutdown (when waiting for slaves), instead of the
main loop individually waiting for each ACK, await_slave_reply()
(renamed await_all_slave_replies()) just waits once for the
repurposed COND_binlog_send to signal it is empty.
4) Test rpl_semi_sync_shutdown_await_ack is updates as following:
4.1) Added test case (adapted from Kristian Nielsen) to ensure
that if a thread awaiting its ACK is killed while SHUTDOWN WAIT FOR
ALL SLAVES is issued, the primary will still wait for the ACK from
the killed thread.
4.2) As connections which by-passed phase 1 of thread killing no
longer are delayed for kill until phase 2, we can no longer query
yes/no tx after receiving an ACK/timeout. The check for these
variables is removed.
4.3) Comment descriptions are updated which mention that the
connection is alive; and adjusted to be the Ack_thread.
Reviewed By:
============
Kristian Nielsen <email address hidden>
https://jepsen.io/analyses/mysql-8.0.34 highlights that the
transaction isolation levels in the InnoDB storage engine do not
correspond to any widely accepted definitions, such as
"Generalized Isolation Level Definitions" https://pmg.csail.mit.edu/papers/icde00.pdf
(PL-1 = READ UNCOMMITTED, PL-2 = READ COMMITTED, PL-2.99 = REPEATABLE READ,
PL-3 = SERIALIZABLE).
Only READ UNCOMMITTED in InnoDB seems to match the above definition.
The issue is that InnoDB does not detect write/write conflicts
(Section 4.4.3, Definition 6) in the above.
It appears that as soon as we implement write/write conflict detection
(SET SESSION innodb_snapshot_isolation=ON), the default isolation level
(SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ) will become
Snapshot Isolation (similar to Postgres), as defined in Section 4.2 of
"A Critique of ANSI SQL Isolation Levels", MSR-TR-95-51, June 1995 https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/tr-95-51.pdf
Locking reads inside InnoDB used to read the latest committed version,
ignoring what should actually be visible to the transaction.
The added test innodb.lock_isolation illustrates this. The statement
UPDATE t SET a=3 WHERE b=2;
is executed in a transaction that was started before a read view or
a snapshot of the current transaction was created, and committed before
the current transaction attempts to execute
UPDATE t SET b=3;
If SET innodb_snapshot_isolation=ON is in effect when the second
transaction was started, the second transaction will be aborted with
the error ER_CHECKREAD. By default (innodb_snapshot_isolation=OFF),
the second transaction would execute inconsistently, displaying an
incorrect SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t in its read view.
If innodb_snapshot_isolation=ON, if an attempt to acquire a lock on a
record that does not exist in the current read view is made, an error
DB_RECORD_CHANGED (HA_ERR_RECORD_CHANGED, ER_CHECKREAD) will
be raised. This error will be treated in the same way as a deadlock:
the transaction will be rolled back.
lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock(): If the current transaction has
a read view where the record is not visible and
innodb_snapshot_isolation=ON, fail before trying to acquire the lock.
row_sel_build_committed_vers_for_mysql(): If innodb_snapshot_isolation=ON,
disable the "semi-consistent read" logic that had been implemented by
myself on the directions of Heikki Tuuri in order to address https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=3300 that was motivated by a customer
wanting UPDATE to skip locked rows that do not match the WHERE condition.
It looks like my changes were included in the MySQL 5.1.5
commit ad126d90e019f223470e73e1b2b528f9007c4532; at that time, employees
of Innobase Oy (a recent acquisition of Oracle) had lost write access to
the repository.
The only reason why we set innodb_snapshot_isolation=OFF by default is
backward compatibility with applications, such as the one that motivated
the implementation of "semi-consistent read" back in 2005. In a later
major release, we can default to innodb_snapshot_isolation=ON.
Thanks to Peter Alvaro, Kyle Kingsbury and Alexey Gotsman for their work
on https://github.com/jepsen-io/ and to Kyle and Alexey for explanations
and some testing of this fix.
Thanks to Vladislav Lesin for the initial test for MDEV-26643,
as well as reviewing these changes.
MDEV-33716: rpl.rpl_semi_sync_slave_enabled_consistent Fails with Error Condition Reached
Though the test itself doesn't create any transactions
directly, the added test suppressions are replicated,
and when the SQL thread is stopped mid-execution,
it is set into an error state because these are
non-transactional events being aborted.
This patch fixes the test by ensuring that the test
suppressions are fully replicated before continuing
MDEV-33542 Inplace algorithm occupies more disk space compared to copy algorithm
Problem:
=======
- In case of large file size, InnoDB eagerly adds the new extent
even though there are many existing unused pages of the segment.
Reason is that in case of larger file size, threshold
(1/8 of reserved pages) for adding new extent has been
reached frequently.
Solution:
=========
- Try to utilise the unused pages in the segment before adding
the new extent in the file segment.
need_for_new_extent(): In case of larger file size, try to use
the 4 * FSP_EXTENT_SIZE as threshold to allocate the new extent.
fseg_alloc_free_page_low(): Rewrote the function to allocate
the page in the following order.
1) Try to get the page from existing segment extent.
2) Check whether the segment needs new extent
(need_for_new_extent()) and allocate the new extent,
find the page.
3) Take individual page from the unused page from
segment or tablespace.
4) Allocate a new extent and take first page from it.
Do *not* check if socket is closed by another thread. This is
race-condition prone, unnecessary, and harmful. VIO state was introduced
to debug the errors, not to change the behavior.
Rather than checking if socket is closed, add a DBUG_ASSERT that it is
*not* closed, because this is an actual logic error, and can potentially
lead to all sorts of funny behavior like writing error packets to Innodb
files.
Unlike closesocket(), shutdown(2) is not actually race-condition prone,
and it breaks poll() and read(), and it worked for longer than a decade,
and it does not need any state check in the code.
MDEV-33478: Tests massively fail with clang-18 -fsanitize=memory
Starting with clang-16, MemorySanitizer appears to check that
uninitialized values not be passed by value nor returned.
Previously, it was allowed to copy uninitialized data in such cases.
get_foreign_key_info(): Remove a local variable that was passed
uninitialized to a function.
DsMrr_impl: Initialize key_buffer, because DsMrr_impl::dsmrr_init()
is reading it.
test_bind_result_ext1(): MYSQL_TYPE_LONG is 32 bits, hence we must
use a 32-bit type, such as int. sizeof(long) differs between
LP64 and LLP64 targets.
