MDEV-29283 Assertion `0' failed -or- Assertion `item->maybe_null()' failed - both in virtual void Type_handler_string_result::make_sort_key_part - on UPDATE ... ORDER BY ... LIMIT 0
LIMIT & OFFSET also can influence one raw subselect NULL
MDEV-31064 Changes in a SP are not immediately seen in I_S.parameters
If procedure is changed in one connection, and other procedure has
already called the initial version of the procedure, the query to
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PARAMETERS would use obsolete information from sp
cache for that connection. That happens because cache invalidating
method only increments cache version, and does not flush (all) the
cache(s), and changing of a procedure only invalidates cache, and
removes the procedure's cache entry from local thread cache only.
The fix adds the check if sp info obtained from the cache for forming of
results for the query to I_S, is not obsoleted, and does not use it, if
it is.
The test has been added to main.information_schema. It changes the SP in
one connection, and ensures, that the change is seen in the query to the
I_S.PARAMETERS in other connection, that already has called the
procedure before the change.
MDEV-29284 ANALYZE doesn't work with pushed derived tables
There was no actual execution of the SQL of a pushed derived table,
which caused "r_rows" to be always displayed as 0 and "r_total_time_ms"
to show inaccurate numbers.
This commit makes a derived table SQL to be executed by the storage
engine, so the server is able to calculate the number of rows returned
and measure the execution time more accurately
MDEV-10962 Deadlock with 3 concurrent DELETEs by unique key
PROBLEM:
A deadlock was possible when a transaction tried to "upgrade" an already
held Record Lock to Next Key Lock.
SOLUTION:
This patch is based on observations that:
(1) a Next Key Lock is equivalent to Record Lock combined with Gap Lock
(2) a GAP Lock never has to wait for any other lock
In case we request a Next Key Lock, we check if we already own a Record
Lock of equal or stronger mode, and if so, then we change the requested
lock type to GAP Lock, which we either already have, or can be granted
immediately, as GAP locks don't conflict with any other lock types.
(We don't consider Insert Intention Locks a Gap Lock in above statements).
The reason of why we don't upgrage Record Lock to Next Key Lock is the
following.
Imagine a transaction which does something like this:
for each row {
request lock in LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode
request lock in LOCK_S mode
}
If we upgraded lock from Record Lock to Next Key lock, there would be
created only two lock_t structs for each page, one for
LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode and one for LOCK_S mode, and then used
their bitmaps to mark all records from the same page.
The situation would look like this:
request lock in LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode on row 1:
// -> creates new lock_t for LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode and sets bit for
// 1
request lock in LOCK_S mode on row 1:
// -> notices that we already have LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP on the row 1,
// so it upgrades it to X
request lock in LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode on row 2:
// -> creates a new lock_t for LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode (because we
// don't have any after we've upgraded!) and sets bit for 2
request lock in LOCK_S mode on row 2:
// -> notices that we already have LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP on the row 2,
// so it upgrades it to X
...etc...etc..
Each iteration of the loop creates a new lock_t struct, and in the end we
have a lot (one for each record!) of LOCK_X locks, each with single bit
set in the bitmap. Soon we run out of space for lock_t structs.
If we create LOCK_GAP instead of lock upgrading, the above scenario works
like the following:
// -> creates new lock_t for LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode and sets bit for
// 1
request lock in LOCK_S mode on row 1:
// -> notices that we already have LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP on the row 1,
// so it creates LOCK_S|LOCK_GAP only and sets bit for 1
request lock in LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP mode on row 2:
// -> reuses the lock_t for LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP by setting bit for 2
request lock in LOCK_S mode on row 2:
// -> notices that we already have LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP on the row 2,
// so it reuses LOCK_S|LOCK_GAP setting bit for 2
In the end we have just two locks per page, one for each mode:
LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP and LOCK_S|LOCK_GAP.
Another benefit of this solution is that it avoids not-entirely
const-correct, (and otherwise looking risky) "upgrading".
The fix was ported from
mysql/mysql-server@bfba840dfa7794b988c59c94658920dbe556075d
mysql/mysql-server@75cefdb1f73b8f8ac8e22b10dfb5073adbdfdfb0
This fixes mdev_26541.test, and the new clean_up_spider.inc will be
useful for other tests where part of deinit_spider does not apply,
e.g. those testing spider initialisation only.
