Merge lp:~deeptik/lava-test/tiobench into lp:lava-test/0.0
Proposed by
Deepti B. Kalakeri
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | 52 |
Proposed branch: | lp:~deeptik/lava-test/tiobench |
Merge into: | lp:lava-test/0.0 |
Diff against target: |
73 lines (+69/-0) 1 file modified
abrek/test_definitions/tiobench.py (+69/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~deeptik/lava-test/tiobench |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Paul Larson (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+37501@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
This patch automates the installation, execution, and parsing of tiobench IO performance test suite. This patch has been tested on Manderick for installation/
The test first run through with a 4KB block size and then again with a 8KB block size with 10 threads in parallel for 2 iterations. This is just an example.
Please suggest an appropriate values to be used for the parameters which would align to the Linaro testing.
To post a comment you must log in.
37 + "./tiobench.pl --block=4096 --block=8192 --threads=10 "\
38 + " --size=%s --numruns=2" % (VERSION, FILE_SIZE)]
Is there a reason why --block is specified twice?
Also, we need to scale this WAAAAAY back. Most of the devices we use are booted off a small SD card, so space is very limited. Also, 10 threads on a single-core, low power device is about 8 or 9 too many.