Apologies, but as previous comments have mentioned, glxgears is not recommended as a benchmark, this is documented in many places, a couple of which are:
Checkbox has two existing 3d benchmarks: glmark (with a glmark-es variant) and globs. Both are more thorough than glxgears, however both are really easy for any modern GPU (i.e. even a built-in Intel GPU can blaze through these benchmarks).
Unfortunately the phoronix/unigine combo seems to be the best available benchmark, but it has licensing and installation issues that make it a bit cumbersome to use.
Regardless, since glxgears has little value as a benchmark, I have to reject this proposal, however if you need benchmarking I suggest you use one of the existing tests.
Thanks for your contribution and again, apologies for being unable to accept this in checkbox.
Hello,
Apologies, but as previous comments have mentioned, glxgears is not recommended as a benchmark, this is documented in many places, a couple of which are:
https:/ /wiki.archlinux .org/index. php/Benchmarkin g#glxgears_ .28and_ why_not_ to_use_ this_as_ a_benchmark. 29
http:// wiki.cchtml. com/index. php/Glxgears_ is_not_ a_Benchmark
Checkbox has two existing 3d benchmarks: glmark (with a glmark-es variant) and globs. Both are more thorough than glxgears, however both are really easy for any modern GPU (i.e. even a built-in Intel GPU can blaze through these benchmarks).
Unfortunately the phoronix/unigine combo seems to be the best available benchmark, but it has licensing and installation issues that make it a bit cumbersome to use.
Regardless, since glxgears has little value as a benchmark, I have to reject this proposal, however if you need benchmarking I suggest you use one of the existing tests.
Thanks for your contribution and again, apologies for being unable to accept this in checkbox.