On 1 Aug 2012, at 11:27, Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> I think the breakage was because previously we were not running the > tides test as a longtest with intel fortran. It's possible that > gfortran is more lenient about unassociated pointers that are not > read.
Buildbot green http://buildbot-ocean.ese.ic.ac.uk:8080/builders/fix- momcg-les-no-dynamic/builds/0
« Back to merge proposal
On 1 Aug 2012, at 11:27, Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> I think the breakage was because previously we were not running the
> tides test as a longtest with intel fortran. It's possible that
> gfortran is more lenient about unassociated pointers that are not
> read.
Buildbot green http:// buildbot- ocean.ese. ic.ac.uk: 8080/builders/ fix- no-dynamic/ builds/ 0
momcg-les-