On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:53:24PM -0000, Tyler Baker wrote:
> Review: Approve
>
> Approved. I grepped through the tip, looks to me you have renamed all
> occurances. Thanks for enabling the prebuilt images!
>
> I'm curious if you have tested UEFI booting with a prebuilt image with
> these changes?
I did, that was actually my initial motivation - having to wait for
l-m-c every time was killing me. ;-)
> I suggest we add a functional test cases for UEFI / AXF booting with a
> prebuilt image.
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:53:24PM -0000, Tyler Baker wrote:
> Review: Approve
>
> Approved. I grepped through the tip, looks to me you have renamed all
> occurances. Thanks for enabling the prebuilt images!
>
> I'm curious if you have tested UEFI booting with a prebuilt image with
> these changes?
I did, that was actually my initial motivation - having to wait for
l-m-c every time was killing me. ;-)
> I suggest we add a functional test cases for UEFI / AXF booting with a
> prebuilt image.
Agreed. Can you please create one based on
http:// community. validation. linaro. org/images/ armv7-fastmodel /hwpack_ linaro- vexpress_ 20130811- 427_armhf_ supported. tar.gz community. validation. linaro. org/images/ armv7-fastmodel /linaro- raring- nano-lava- 20130811- 459.tar. gz
http://
and let me know?
I already did the renaming from bootloader to bootloadertype in the repository.
> The only CI job I'm aware of that uses the old "bootloader" parameter validation. linaro. org/dashboard/ image-reports/ linux-efi- stub
> is:
> http://
>
> When we deploy to production, we need to communicate this change to Fathi at that time.
I'm talking to him on IRC about it.