Thanks! Columns are not truncated now, which certainly fixes the issue with copying its contents.
Otoh, row height is now ~8x taller, which might make the table unwieldily long, imho. Would that be an issue?
https://private-fileshare.canonical.com/~maxiberta/Screenshot_20200625_120258.png
If so, maybe it can be improved a bit:
- Join Type and IP address columns. - Make the UA column wider. - Move general layout from 4+8 cols to 3+9 cols (this is a site-wide design change and would probably need a more thorough review from UX/Design).
https://private-fileshare.canonical.com/~maxiberta/Screenshot_20200625_120547.png
Diff (including mock data): https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/qcM7HYs3Vj/
This is just a mock I came up with in 5mins. Please feel free to ignore :)
« Back to merge proposal
Thanks! Columns are not truncated now, which certainly fixes the issue with copying its contents.
Otoh, row height is now ~8x taller, which might make the table unwieldily long, imho. Would that be an issue?
https:/ /private- fileshare. canonical. com/~maxiberta/ Screenshot_ 20200625_ 120258. png
If so, maybe it can be improved a bit:
- Join Type and IP address columns.
- Make the UA column wider.
- Move general layout from 4+8 cols to 3+9 cols (this is a site-wide design change and would probably need a more thorough review from UX/Design).
https:/ /private- fileshare. canonical. com/~maxiberta/ Screenshot_ 20200625_ 120547. png
Diff (including mock data): https:/ /pastebin. canonical. com/p/qcM7HYs3V j/
This is just a mock I came up with in 5mins. Please feel free to ignore :)