On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 22:27 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Hi,
>
> I'm guessing the rest of the code doesn't rely on the device
> being unmounted, so removing the sequential unmount is ok.
There's no code running after this, so I think just changing the
docstring to state clearly that the umount won't happen until l-m-c
exits is fine.
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 22:27 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Hi,
>
> I'm guessing the rest of the code doesn't rely on the device
> being unmounted, so removing the sequential unmount is ok.
There's no code running after this, so I think just changing the
docstring to state clearly that the umount won't happen until l-m-c
exits is fine.
Thanks for the review!