Code review comment for lp:~rhettg/gearmand/no-unique

Revision history for this message
rhettg (rhettg) wrote :

Oh, somebody did see this :)

I'm also concerned that the running daemon considers the unique key to
essentially be (task name, unique key) but the persistence
implementations don't care about task name. But one thing at a
time....

Rhett

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Brian Aker <email address hidden> wrote:
> Thanks! I believe you are right. I will try to take a look at this tomorrow.
>
>
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~rhettg/gearmand/no-unique/+merge/16603
> You are the owner of lp:~rhettg/gearmand/no-unique.
>

« Back to merge proposal