Code review comment for ~rafaeldtinoco/+git/net-snmp:lp1855943-focal

Revision history for this message
Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) wrote :

> The drop+add for 1835818 seemed odd at first but eventually right to me

Yep, it was better as the other didn't apply cleanly and wasn't backed by upstream one.

« Back to merge proposal