Merge ~pfsmorigo/review-tools:pfsmorigo/core24 into review-tools:master
Proposed by
Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | 16774166e20f9f5362dea3193f26dc35343663ed |
Proposed branch: | ~pfsmorigo/review-tools:pfsmorigo/core24 |
Merge into: | review-tools:master |
Diff against target: |
141 lines (+43/-13) 6 files modified
reviewtools/overrides.py (+28/-1) reviewtools/sr_lint.py (+2/-2) reviewtools/store.py (+1/-0) reviewtools/tests/test_store.py (+10/-0) tests/manual-lzo-part2.sh (+1/-5) tests/manual-lzo.sh (+1/-5) |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Alex Murray | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+446424@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
Hello team, can you review this pull request? Some doubts I had while doing it:
r/overrides.
func_base_
Do I need to do a state files overrride for core24 too?
r/store.py:46:
I use "undefined" for snap_to_release. Is that ok?
r/t/test_
There is this test and to add one for core24 I need the release name right?
test_check_
To post a comment you must log in.
> r/overrides. py:1038: state_files_ snaps_overrides = {"core22": "20220421"}
> func_base_
> Do I need to do a state files overrride for core24 too?
>
This state files override exists so that as soon as that date passes, we consider the contents of the snap to be stable and from that point onwards will run the stateful checks - since we don't know the exact release date of 24.04 this is a bit tricky, but perhaps set this as 20240430 for now since it should definitely be released not too long before that date.
> r/store.py:46:
> I use "undefined" for snap_to_release. Is that ok?
>
We know this will be NN - so how about nanimal for now (as this kind of nomenclature has been used before)?
> r/t/test_ store.py: 2121: get_ubuntu_ release_ from_manifest_ os_release_ neon_bionic_ core22
> There is this test and to add one for core24 I need the release name right?
> test_check_
You could use nanimal again here if you want.