Code review comment for ~mwhudson/curtin:lp-1893818

Revision history for this message
Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote :

> > But in groovy+, the udev rule from multipath-tools that has
> > always attempted to remove the devices nodes for the partitions
> > of a disk that is a multipath member actually succeeds, and
>
> Won't this break curtin on older multipaths that don't have this rule?

No, if the device node for a partition of a disk that is a multipath member is still present, this branch ignores it (or at least that's the intent...)

> Or will this work with older multipath output since we're only referring to
> the mpath dev (rather than a path of the mpath device)?

Er, I think so. Not completely sure about the distinction you're making here.

> Some comments inline.

Replies inline.

« Back to merge proposal