Both are in WIP, but ready. If I'm OOO after the decision on this is taken, feel free to mark Needs Review and Approve/Reject depending on the taken decision.
About the complexity in the long-term: how feasible would it be to upgrade to a new version of this package with new features in noble as LTS? It sounds like we would need a SRU exception for only once... Oh, I forgot Robie's comment (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcryptx-perl/+bug/2046154/comments/7)... so, at the end, What will the way more compatible to do the SRU to noble later?
1- This MP, removing all the patches and restoring the dependency in d/control as SRU?
2- removing the package from sync-blocklist, and doing a "sync-SRU"?
3- removing the suffix as SRU-change, and sync automatically in MM and "SRU-sync" to noble?
I don't know if a sync to a GA LTS can be done, hence my questions.
Hi Andreas, Christian:
Adding here the third scenario (blocking by suffix):
https:/ /code.launchpad .net/~mirespace /ubuntu/ +source/ libmail- dkim-perl/ +git/libmail- dkim-perl/ +merge/ 461344
As the sync-blocklist MP.
Both are in WIP, but ready. If I'm OOO after the decision on this is taken, feel free to mark Needs Review and Approve/Reject depending on the taken decision.
About the complexity in the long-term: how feasible would it be to upgrade to a new version of this package with new features in noble as LTS? It sounds like we would need a SRU exception for only once... Oh, I forgot Robie's comment (https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ libcryptx- perl/+bug/ 2046154/ comments/ 7)... so, at the end, What will the way more compatible to do the SRU to noble later?
1- This MP, removing all the patches and restoring the dependency in d/control as SRU?
2- removing the package from sync-blocklist, and doing a "sync-SRU"?
3- removing the suffix as SRU-change, and sync automatically in MM and "SRU-sync" to noble?
I don't know if a sync to a GA LTS can be done, hence my questions.