Code review comment for lp:~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-expo-code-cleanup

>
> It does appear from the screenshots to be a lot better from what I remember,
> however screenshots can be misleading. One needs to consider how monitors are
> positioned in reality. Then again, I can see the argument for allowing it to
> work so long as the user asked for it - it might just be that the user's
> monitors are positioned correctly so that it doesn't look misaligned. But
> there's no way to verify this programatically
>
Believe me, I would not use this mode if it would not be better ;)

> What I might suggest is that - how about changing the default in the .xml file
> to be "one wall per output" and I'll look into any bugs to do with the second
> output being black (I'm sure its quite simple). Then the user can pick "one
> big wall" if it would make sense on their particular configuration, as I think
> it tends to work better in fewer configurations than the former does. Doing it
> that way, incidentally, helps to get around some complicated alignment issues
> that happen with unity, and I believe that the workspaces design specification
> mandated independent workspace picking per output.
>
That sounds like a great solution. +1
Thanks for looking into the related bugs, that sounds very good also :)

I will look into the defaults later, but would really prefer to do that in a
follow-up proposal as this sounds like having to do some quilting again and when
doing that I would also fix some other related expo.xml.in bugs, which also need
some quilt magic...