This looks good to me. At some point, I think it would be nice if we could find a good way to support a generic 'unprivileged' user that would use the default user on the system, but maybe the real answer is that provisioning should always install the system with the same unprivileged user...
This looks good to me. At some point, I think it would be nice if we could find a good way to support a generic 'unprivileged' user that would use the default user on the system, but maybe the real answer is that provisioning should always install the system with the same unprivileged user...