Code review comment for lp:~james-w/canonical-identity-provider/oops2

Revision history for this message
James Westby (james-w) wrote :

nessita points out that sourcedeps might be preferred to pip now. Also sso is on lucid, and
the packages we have will be for precise.

There's also a question of whether requirements.txt should list all the new deps (e.g. the
amqp library that oops_amqp will use), or just the top-level ones.

« Back to merge proposal