On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:49:47PM +0200, Xin Gu wrote:
> On 15/03/12 13:41, Christof Mroz wrote:
> >Review: Needs Information
> >
> >A<code> tag looks more appropriate than<emphasis> (also in other places throught the file)
> >http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/code.html
>
> Although from the link you provided, <code> tag can be the child of
> <para>, I found that changing to <code> tag causes XML validation
> failure. Now I still using <emphasis> tag.
That is not the right solution. Look around in the file for better markup
suggestions.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:49:47PM +0200, Xin Gu wrote: www.docbook. org/tdg/ en/html/ code.html
> On 15/03/12 13:41, Christof Mroz wrote:
> >Review: Needs Information
> >
> >A<code> tag looks more appropriate than<emphasis> (also in other places throught the file)
> >http://
>
> Although from the link you provided, <code> tag can be the child of
> <para>, I found that changing to <code> tag causes XML validation
> failure. Now I still using <emphasis> tag.
That is not the right solution. Look around in the file for better markup
suggestions.
Diego