On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> Do you know under what circumstances a device support might want to set
> BPTR itself?
Slightly off-topic, but I suggest removing BPTR and use VAL field instead.
VAL is not used for anything at the moment, AFAIR, and is also
DBF_NOACCESS, so this is even compatible (but not for device support, maybe
this is the reason this hasn't been done before?).
On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> Do you know under what circumstances a device support might want to set
> BPTR itself?
Slightly off-topic, but I suggest removing BPTR and use VAL field instead.
VAL is not used for anything at the moment, AFAIR, and is also
DBF_NOACCESS, so this is even compatible (but not for device support, maybe
this is the reason this hasn't been done before?).
Same for waveform record, BTW.
Cheers
Ben