On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:11:00 +0200, Stefan Götz
<email address hidden> wrote:
>>> [L] Again, when is a rule 'valid'?
>>
>> Explaining the input format in detail would be reciting the
>> implementation, I think. It already states that rules set up by
>> hip_fw_manage_esp_rule() are covered, which is the important info.
>
> Yes, I agree. What I meant was: it is not obvious, that 'rule' ==
> 'input'.
Ah I see what you meant in the last comment now.
> Something like '@return true if @a input could be parsed as an ESP
> rule and the output parameters were set to the according values, false
> otherwise'
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:11:00 +0200, Stefan Götz
<email address hidden> wrote:
>>> [L] Again, when is a rule 'valid'? manage_ esp_rule( ) are covered, which is the important info.
>>
>> Explaining the input format in detail would be reciting the
>> implementation, I think. It already states that rules set up by
>> hip_fw_
>
> Yes, I agree. What I meant was: it is not obvious, that 'rule' ==
> 'input'.
Ah I see what you meant in the last comment now.
> Something like '@return true if @a input could be parsed as an ESP
> rule and the output parameters were set to the according values, false
> otherwise'
Thanks, I'll plagiarize that.