The changes LGTM and I agreed that the regression risk seems low. Patch is upstream and in later version and all else that is usually needed.
It seems the bug was dead by a lack of feedback or a local reproducer. Since you got the latter we are good.
+1 for resolving this.
P.S. you will get bonus points if you can tell me at standup why "patch on a plate" by Jon is different than "general Community patch on a plate" :-)
« Back to merge proposal
The changes LGTM and I agreed that the regression risk seems low.
Patch is upstream and in later version and all else that is usually needed.
It seems the bug was dead by a lack of feedback or a local reproducer. Since you got the latter we are good.
+1 for resolving this.
P.S. you will get bonus points if you can tell me at standup why "patch on a plate" by Jon is different than "general Community patch on a plate" :-)