OK as a workaround but slightly changes the test. It would be more consistent to close the surfaces at the end of the test (and not in the test loop). Vis:
received.wait_for(400ms);
}
for (auto const surface : client_surface) mir_surface_release_sync(surface);
}
OK as a workaround but slightly changes the test. It would be more consistent to close the surfaces at the end of the test (and not in the test loop). Vis:
}
for (auto const surface : client_surface)
mir_surface_ release_ sync(surface) ;
}