2018-04-17 13:15 GMT-05:00 Jeremy Bicha <email address hidden>:
> I am very concerned with the decision to add 11 more patches to bionic's gnome-shell. I am concerned that this
> could make updating to 3.28.2 difficult (or the 3.30 series) if too much code is changed before these patches
> are accepted in to GNOME.
Considering how the pace at gnome-shell development is currently, I
think this won't be really a problem.
Plus, I've linked the git repo I've used to generate all this, and
using patch-queue, you know that rebasing won't really be an issue.
In any, case I can take care of it. Although I hope some of these
patch will merge (where's it's not already the case).
> You could at least help reduce this number by following up on the patches that have already been applied to upstream master
> to see if they can be pushed to the gnome-3-28 branch.
There's not gnome-3-28 branch yet, thus everything that here has been
cherry-picked from master, will be in 3.28.X.
> Please also try to be more persistent with getting upstream review of the remaining patches.
Eh, true, but I also don't like to bother people :).
> I encourage you to talk to Debian's smcv to see if he would be interested in taking some of these patches in to Debian.
Yeah, I already planned to propose some of them to salsa too.
> One minor note. The patch rename wasn't done in this merge proposal. Maybe that was missed when exporting your work from git.
2018-04-17 13:15 GMT-05:00 Jeremy Bicha <email address hidden>:
> I am very concerned with the decision to add 11 more patches to bionic's gnome-shell. I am concerned that this
> could make updating to 3.28.2 difficult (or the 3.30 series) if too much code is changed before these patches
> are accepted in to GNOME.
Considering how the pace at gnome-shell development is currently, I
think this won't be really a problem.
Plus, I've linked the git repo I've used to generate all this, and
using patch-queue, you know that rebasing won't really be an issue.
In any, case I can take care of it. Although I hope some of these
patch will merge (where's it's not already the case).
> You could at least help reduce this number by following up on the patches that have already been applied to upstream master
> to see if they can be pushed to the gnome-3-28 branch.
There's not gnome-3-28 branch yet, thus everything that here has been
cherry-picked from master, will be in 3.28.X.
> Please also try to be more persistent with getting upstream review of the remaining patches.
Eh, true, but I also don't like to bother people :).
> I encourage you to talk to Debian's smcv to see if he would be interested in taking some of these patches in to Debian.
Yeah, I already planned to propose some of them to salsa too.
> One minor note. The patch rename wasn't done in this merge proposal. Maybe that was missed when exporting your work from git.
Oh, well spotted. Thanks.