> Since we only have an overshoot for swiping, > 1131 +void UCListItemPrivate::resetSwipeOvershoot() > may be called resetOvershoot()?
The property is called swipeOvershoot afaik, so teh reset follows the naming follows the getter/setter/reset naming convention.
« Back to merge proposal
> Since we only have an overshoot for swiping, te::resetSwipeO vershoot( )
> 1131 +void UCListItemPriva
> may be called resetOvershoot()?
The property is called swipeOvershoot afaik, so teh reset follows the naming follows the getter/setter/reset naming convention.