Code review comment for lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/module-schema-tools

Revision history for this message
Chris Hillery (ceejatec) wrote :

It looks like you didn't fix the indentation of calls to init_val() in zorbacmdproperties_base.h, and in fact it looks like you moved a number of other instances of calls to that method onto the ends of earlier lines of code in zorba_properties.h. It's just not good readability. To be clear, I'm talking about lines like this:

   if (*argv == NULL) { result = "No value given for --classpath option"; break; } init_val (*argv, theClasspath, d);

There's no reason to have that call to init_val() hanging out over there. I count 9 places where this is done, most of which were put that way with this change.

You also didn't rename the class "IStream". Rodolfo reported that that class name conflicted with a Windows class, making the code not compile on Windows. It's not clear to me if this is one of the changes for "optimizing XQJ" you mentioned, but if it actually causes a compilation failure it must be changed.

review: Needs Fixing

« Back to merge proposal