> > 4. Should we say something about text nodes, eg, that their identifier is
> not
> > really immutable and it can be used to dereference the node only during the
> > same snapshot in which the identifier was retrieved?
>
> This refers to the other module, the one with the structural uris.
> Identifiers/references work the same for every node. Structural uris cannot be
> dereferenced (our choice), so it is not a problem.
> We never say however that the structural relationship of a non-text node
> remains the same in the node lifetime. Maybe we should. What do you think?
Sorry, I got confused again between identifiers and ordpaths.
> > 4. Should we say something about text nodes, eg, that their identifier is references work the same for every node. Structural uris cannot be
> not
> > really immutable and it can be used to dereference the node only during the
> > same snapshot in which the identifier was retrieved?
>
> This refers to the other module, the one with the structural uris.
> Identifiers/
> dereferenced (our choice), so it is not a problem.
> We never say however that the structural relationship of a non-text node
> remains the same in the node lifetime. Maybe we should. What do you think?
Sorry, I got confused again between identifiers and ordpaths.