> The change looks good. One question: is using the same prefix that the
> original module used likely to cause any conflicts? Are those prefixes
> generally unique as well as the module prefixes?
I think that that is what Dana meant by suggesting uniformity: as a result I have added bug lp:956318.
If you are OK with this answer please set the status of this merge to 'Approve' such that the Validation Queue is able to pick it up.
Thanks.
> The change looks good. One question: is using the same prefix that the
> original module used likely to cause any conflicts? Are those prefixes
> generally unique as well as the module prefixes?
I think that that is what Dana meant by suggesting uniformity: as a result I have added bug lp:956318.
If you are OK with this answer please set the status of this merge to 'Approve' such that the Validation Queue is able to pick it up.
Thanks.