I'm not sure, if I figure the right Xerces Error code for it should be easy but prom past this was quite tricky.
Cezar
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Federico Cavalieri <email address hidden>wrote:
> I transferred the bugs to Cezar, thanks. > > They are blocking the merge of the PUL production/application. When those > are fixed I think there will be another very small issue to cope with > validation, which occur when I try to validate an element against a > specific type definition. However, maybe a real fix to 912722 will solve > this. > > All in all i do not consider them really urgent, because I am about to > leave for a conference, and I will be basically unavailable to do real work > for a week or so. Thus even if they are fixed in this timeframe the > integration of the PUL branch will not occur sooner. Is a real fix to > 912722 expensive to make? > > Cheers > -- > > https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bugs-912586-912593-912722/+merge/87749<https://code.launchpad.net/%7Ezorba-coders/zorba/bugs-912586-912593-912722/+merge/87749> > Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders > Post to : <email address hidden> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
« Back to merge proposal
I'm not sure, if I figure the right Xerces Error code for it should be easy
but prom past this was quite tricky.
Cezar
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Federico Cavalieri
<email address hidden>wrote:
> I transferred the bugs to Cezar, thanks. application. When those /code.launchpad .net/~zorba- coders/ zorba/bugs- 912586- 912593- 912722/ +merge/ 87749<https:/ /code.launchpad .net/%7Ezorba- coders/ zorba/bugs- 912586- 912593- 912722/ +merge/ 87749> /launchpad. net/~zorba- coders /launchpad. net/~zorba- coders /help.launchpad .net/ListHelp
>
> They are blocking the merge of the PUL production/
> are fixed I think there will be another very small issue to cope with
> validation, which occur when I try to validate an element against a
> specific type definition. However, maybe a real fix to 912722 will solve
> this.
>
> All in all i do not consider them really urgent, because I am about to
> leave for a conference, and I will be basically unavailable to do real work
> for a week or so. Thus even if they are fixed in this timeframe the
> integration of the PUL branch will not occur sooner. Is a real fix to
> 912722 expensive to make?
>
> Cheers
> --
>
> https:/
> Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
>
> --
> Mailing list: https:/
> Post to : <email address hidden>
> Unsubscribe : https:/
> More help : https:/
>