They are blocking the merge of the PUL production/application. When those are fixed I think there will be another very small issue to cope with validation, which occur when I try to validate an element against a specific type definition. However, maybe a real fix to 912722 will solve this.
All in all i do not consider them really urgent, because I am about to leave for a conference, and I will be basically unavailable to do real work for a week or so. Thus even if they are fixed in this timeframe the integration of the PUL branch will not occur sooner. Is a real fix to 912722 expensive to make?
I transferred the bugs to Cezar, thanks.
They are blocking the merge of the PUL production/ application. When those are fixed I think there will be another very small issue to cope with validation, which occur when I try to validate an element against a specific type definition. However, maybe a real fix to 912722 will solve this.
All in all i do not consider them really urgent, because I am about to leave for a conference, and I will be basically unavailable to do real work for a week or so. Thus even if they are fixed in this timeframe the integration of the PUL branch will not occur sooner. Is a real fix to 912722 expensive to make?
Cheers