Code review comment for lp:~ywwg/mixxx/features_xwax2

Revision history for this message
Owen Williams (ywwg) wrote :

I just pushed a possible fix for this bug. There was a for-loop:

for (int i=0; i<m_iNoPos; ++i)

Which I think means that it starts at 1, not 0? I don't really know how to read valgrind so I'm not sure if that was the problem.

« Back to merge proposal