> Hey Jay, I'm aware that pre-requisites work, but are co-dependent branches > allowed? Basically Branch A depends on Branch B *and* Branch B depends on > Branch A?
Gotcha, sorry, I misunderstood...
> https://code.launchpad.net/~yamahata/glance/lp802883/+merge/66092 > https://code.launchpad.net/~yamahata/glance/lp802885/+merge/66093 > https://code.launchpad.net/~yamahata/glance/lp802878/+merge/66090 > > These three changes don't fix anything individually, but as a whole they seem > to make run_tests.sh work? Maybe I'm an outlier here, but since this branch > doesn't actually fix anything (as in, this line of code doesn't make anything > *work* that I can tell), I'd rather have 1 branch than 3...in this case.
Yes, I would prefer a single branch containing all three bug fixes...
-jay
« Back to merge proposal
> Hey Jay, I'm aware that pre-requisites work, but are co-dependent branches
> allowed? Basically Branch A depends on Branch B *and* Branch B depends on
> Branch A?
Gotcha, sorry, I misunderstood...
> https:/ /code.launchpad .net/~yamahata/ glance/ lp802883/ +merge/ 66092 /code.launchpad .net/~yamahata/ glance/ lp802885/ +merge/ 66093 /code.launchpad .net/~yamahata/ glance/ lp802878/ +merge/ 66090
> https:/
> https:/
>
> These three changes don't fix anything individually, but as a whole they seem
> to make run_tests.sh work? Maybe I'm an outlier here, but since this branch
> doesn't actually fix anything (as in, this line of code doesn't make anything
> *work* that I can tell), I'd rather have 1 branch than 3...in this case.
Yes, I would prefer a single branch containing all three bug fixes...
-jay