> good point about backend type check. I'll see if I can refactor this.
Cool, thanks.
> erase boot, erase userdata, flash boot, reboot : all take about 1 second.
> flash userdata: takes about 120 seconds for 8GB size image ( I am expecting
> linear extrapolation for 16GB sized images).
> But it did look "frozen" during flahshing userdata hence the switch to pulse.
Noted.
> It's ok, but not great. Fastboot is not giving progress output, I guess I can
> add that but that's a low priority patch for some time later.
Yeah, I wouldn't imagine it to be a huge priority.
> good point about backend type check. I'll see if I can refactor this.
Cool, thanks.
> erase boot, erase userdata, flash boot, reboot : all take about 1 second.
> flash userdata: takes about 120 seconds for 8GB size image ( I am expecting
> linear extrapolation for 16GB sized images).
> But it did look "frozen" during flahshing userdata hence the switch to pulse.
Noted.
> It's ok, but not great. Fastboot is not giving progress output, I guess I can
> add that but that's a low priority patch for some time later.
Yeah, I wouldn't imagine it to be a huge priority.