On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:13:29PM -0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Dimitri John Ledkov has proposed merging lp:~xnox/unity-greeter/no-s390x into lp:unity-greeter. > > Requested reviews: > Unity Greeter Development Team (unity-greeter-team) > > For more details, see: > https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/unity-greeter/no-s390x/+merge/312912 > > Do not re-introduce s390x builds now that upstart b-d is now removed.
I thought that the only problem was that we built uninstallable packages due to Depends: upstart. Without that, the s390x packages would be installable and so there's no problem building them.
Is that right?
-- Iain Lane [ <email address hidden> ] Debian Developer [ <email address hidden> ] Ubuntu Developer [ <email address hidden> ]
« Back to merge proposal
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:13:29PM -0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: greeter- team) /code.launchpad .net/~xnox/ unity-greeter/ no-s390x/ +merge/ 312912
> Dimitri John Ledkov has proposed merging lp:~xnox/unity-greeter/no-s390x into lp:unity-greeter.
>
> Requested reviews:
> Unity Greeter Development Team (unity-
>
> For more details, see:
> https:/
>
> Do not re-introduce s390x builds now that upstart b-d is now removed.
I thought that the only problem was that we built uninstallable packages
due to Depends: upstart. Without that, the s390x packages would be
installable and so there's no problem building them.
Is that right?
--
Iain Lane [ <email address hidden> ]
Debian Developer [ <email address hidden> ]
Ubuntu Developer [ <email address hidden> ]