> Should this be generalized, rather than continuing to hard-code a list of squashfs names? (For comparison, casper
> itself uses a glob, it does not have a hard-coded list.)
No, as these are not to be mounted by casper nor to be used as a "live" environment. The live system will mount these elsewhere, as of when needed, for the installation.
> Should this be generalized, rather than continuing to hard-code a list of squashfs names? (For comparison, casper
> itself uses a glob, it does not have a hard-coded list.)
No, as these are not to be mounted by casper nor to be used as a "live" environment. The live system will mount these elsewhere, as of when needed, for the installation.