Code review comment for lp:~xaav/wikkid/auth-provider

>
> How do you feel this would be used?

Basically wikkid would just verify whether an action was allowed or not, and
if not display an access denied page.

What about some general roles? Like View and Edit? I was considering the
> possibility of having "locked" pages, using the first line of of the wiki
> page, a little like he way moin does it.

The way it is now is that it is up to the authorization provider to manage
roles, allowing the most flexibility.

I sort of need to clean this up, the way it is now it's sort of hackish.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tim Penhey <email address hidden>wrote:

> I think the idea of an authorization provider is a good idea. But not
> convinced on determining authorisation based on view name. I feel that it
> could end up with a lot of different authorisation checks needed.
>
> How do you feel this would be used?
>
> What about some general roles? Like View and Edit? I was considering the
> possibility of having "locked" pages, using the first line of of the wiki
> page, a little like he way moin does it.
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~xaav/wikkid/auth-provider/+merge/63755
> You are the owner of lp:~xaav/wikkid/auth-provider.
>