Code review comment for lp:~widelands-dev/widelands/bug543113
Revision history for this message
| SirVer (sirver) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
> Is it even necessary to check if the field is not "swimmable"?
I think it is a good idea to check - for being defensive of future changes.
> Can a field be walkable and swimmable (I don't think so) or swimmable and have and immovable
> (I am not sure about that)?
I am not sure about the portdocks these days. I think the check doesn't hurt.