We want it to be 0 right? I just reverted to how it was in r8823.
Yours did set it to 4 as hessenfarmer said, 4 ways to fix it:
(1)
if (amount != 0 && amount <= 2) { totalchance += 6; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) { totalchance += 4; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) { totalchance += 2; }
(2)
if (amount == 0) { totalchance = totalchance; } else if (amount <= 2) { totalchance += 6; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) { totalchance += 4; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) { totalchance += 2; }
(3) if (amount == 0) { totalchance = 0; } else if (amount <= 2) { totalchance += 6; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) { totalchance += 4; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) { totalchance += 2; }
(4)
if (amount == 0) { // don't do nothing } else if (amount <= 2) { totalchance += 6; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) { totalchance += 4; } else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) { totalchance += 2; }
« Back to merge proposal
We want it to be 0 right? I just reverted to how it was in r8823.
Yours did set it to 4 as hessenfarmer said, 4 ways to fix it:
(1)
if (amount != 0 && amount <= 2) {
totalchance += 6;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) {
totalchance += 4;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) {
totalchance += 2;
}
(2)
if (amount == 0) {
totalchance = totalchance;
} else if (amount <= 2) {
totalchance += 6;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) {
totalchance += 4;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) {
totalchance += 2;
}
(3)
if (amount == 0) {
totalchance = 0;
} else if (amount <= 2) {
totalchance += 6;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) {
totalchance += 4;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) {
totalchance += 2;
}
(4)
if (amount == 0) {
// don't do nothing
} else if (amount <= 2) {
totalchance += 6;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 4) {
totalchance += 4;
} else if (amount != 0 && amount <= 6) {
totalchance += 2;
}