https://codereview.appspot.com/58950043/diff/40001/environs/instances/instancetype_test.go#newcode155
environs/instances/instancetype_test.go:155: about: "small mem
specified, use that even though less than needed for mongodb",
On 2014/02/11 00:39:04, wallyworld wrote:
> On 2014/02/10 08:27:13, dimitern wrote:
> > I think if the user overrode our minimum memory heuristic, we should
at least
> > print out a warning, saying bootstrap might fail due to insufficient
memory
> for
> > mongo.
> Not sure about that. The user could also specify poorly speced systems
for
> charms and we don't emit anything there. This behaviour, allowing the
user to
> specify small memory, is not new - the tests are just being improved.
We have
> never in the past emitted a warning AFAIK.
It's true we never said anything, but it's the UX improvement an
important goal? An overly conservative user might pick 256M so it's
cheap, but then will get frustrated why he can't bootstrap (perhaps
without a nice error in the log).
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/58950043/ diff/40001/ environs/ instances/ instancetype_ test.go instances/ instancetype_ test.go (right):
File environs/
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/58950043/ diff/40001/ environs/ instances/ instancetype_ test.go# newcode155 instances/ instancetype_ test.go: 155: about: "small mem
environs/
specified, use that even though less than needed for mongodb",
On 2014/02/11 00:39:04, wallyworld wrote:
> On 2014/02/10 08:27:13, dimitern wrote:
> > I think if the user overrode our minimum memory heuristic, we should
at least
> > print out a warning, saying bootstrap might fail due to insufficient
memory
> for
> > mongo.
> Not sure about that. The user could also specify poorly speced systems
for
> charms and we don't emit anything there. This behaviour, allowing the
user to
> specify small memory, is not new - the tests are just being improved.
We have
> never in the past emitted a warning AFAIK.
It's true we never said anything, but it's the UX improvement an
important goal? An overly conservative user might pick 256M so it's
cheap, but then will get frustrated why he can't bootstrap (perhaps
without a nice error in the log).
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/58950043/