>>>>> John A Meinel <email address hidden> writes:
> Review: Approve > On 8/8/2011 2:52 PM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote: >> Vincent Ladeuil has proposed merging >> lp:~vila/bzr/822649-bsd-no-fdatasync into lp:bzr. >> >> Requested reviews: bzr-core (bzr-core) Related bugs: Bug #822649 in >> Bazaar: >> "bzrlib.tests.test_transport.TestLocalTransportWriteStream.test_local_fdatasync_calls_fdatasync >> fails on BSDs" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/822649 >> >> For more details, see: >> https://code.launchpad.net/~vila/bzr/822649-bsd-no-fdatasync/+merge/70733 >> >> Don't try to run the test if os.fdatasync is not defined.
> I'm wondering if it would be better to just teach 'overrideAttr' to not > fail when the target attribute doesn't exist.
For other cases, calling *override*Attr for an attribute that doesn't exist and getting yelled at... sounds appropriate :)
Not failing in this specific case would have masked the issue.
Thanks for the prompt review.
« Back to merge proposal
>>>>> John A Meinel <email address hidden> writes:
> Review: Approve tests.test_ transport. TestLocalTransp ortWriteStream. test_local_ fdatasync_ calls_fdatasync /bugs.launchpad .net/bzr/ +bug/822649 /code.launchpad .net/~vila/ bzr/822649- bsd-no- fdatasync/ +merge/ 70733
> On 8/8/2011 2:52 PM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> Vincent Ladeuil has proposed merging
>> lp:~vila/bzr/822649-bsd-no-fdatasync into lp:bzr.
>>
>> Requested reviews: bzr-core (bzr-core) Related bugs: Bug #822649 in
>> Bazaar:
>> "bzrlib.
>> fails on BSDs" https:/
>>
>> For more details, see:
>> https:/
>>
>> Don't try to run the test if os.fdatasync is not defined.
> I'm wondering if it would be better to just teach 'overrideAttr' to not
> fail when the target attribute doesn't exist.
For other cases, calling *override*Attr for an attribute that doesn't
exist and getting yelled at... sounds appropriate :)
Not failing in this specific case would have masked the issue.
Thanks for the prompt review.