>>>>> Andrew Bennetts <email address hidden> writes:
> Martin Pool wrote:
>> On 17 September 2010 14:43, Andrew Bennetts
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>> > I'm also unaware of any actual problems caused by importing the
>> > lazy_import function directly rather than the module, so changing this
>> > convention does seem to have no significant benefit.
>>
>> I'm ok with saying "normally use 'import module'" but I think this
>> should be one of the exceptions.
> I agree.
Pfew, I thought I had to fight for that.
Of course I'm ok with the exception for lazy_import :)
>>>>> Andrew Bennetts <email address hidden> writes:
> Martin Pool wrote:
>> On 17 September 2010 14:43, Andrew Bennetts
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>> > I'm also unaware of any actual problems caused by importing the
>> > lazy_import function directly rather than the module, so changing this
>> > convention does seem to have no significant benefit.
>>
>> I'm ok with saying "normally use 'import module'" but I think this
>> should be one of the exceptions.
> I agree.
Pfew, I thought I had to fight for that.
Of course I'm ok with the exception for lazy_import :)