> This may as well land if it fixes the problems with doctests people are > actually having, even if it's not a complete solution.
Ok.
> > Anyone with for instance, a plugin that adds a hook and doesn't run selftest > with --no-plugins will still risk random behaviour though right?
Right.
> I'd like a > note in the developer documentation saying doctests are not as robustly > isolated as general tests.
> Do you also want to uncomment the doctest we disabled the other day in this > branch?
I did and used it to ensure my fix addressed the related problem.
« Back to merge proposal
> This may as well land if it fixes the problems with doctests people are
> actually having, even if it's not a complete solution.
Ok.
>
> Anyone with for instance, a plugin that adds a hook and doesn't run selftest
> with --no-plugins will still risk random behaviour though right?
Right.
> I'd like a
> note in the developer documentation saying doctests are not as robustly
> isolated as general tests.
Ok.
> Do you also want to uncomment the doctest we disabled the other day in this
> branch?
I did and used it to ensure my fix addressed the related problem.