Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/single-buffer

  1. single-buffer
  2. Merge into development-branch
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

As to 3, I dislike intentionally invoking undefined behaviour in one of our foundation libraries that's deeply involved in hardware twiddling.

Synchronisation is not a nice-to-have, it's a blocking issue. We must ensure exclusivity between the compositor and the client.

« Back to merge proposal