Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/parenting-server-api

Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

It's ugly because:
  * id() to a Surface object is meaningless. Only external users of the surface need the ID.
  * You either have to make the constructor take an ID parameter (more annoying coupling), or add a set_id() function which is the part that would be equally easy to abuse.

But if it unblocks us, I might give it a go.

« Back to merge proposal