Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/no-SurfaceBufferAccess
Revision history for this message
| Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
Agreed. And I don't intentionally seek to use up peoples' time. Although I didn't expect this branch to be controversial.
What I don't want is this to become a branch that is rejected on non-technical grounds of simply creating too much discussion. If there is a logical reason why this simplification is not beneficial (or less beneficial than not landing it) then I'm all ears.