Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/no-SurfaceBufferAccess

Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

A buffer is just a buffer. You don't and shouldn't need a Surface to reason about a Buffer. We have explicitly designed all our classes with this in mind. Isolation, high cohesion, low coupling. That's how we have testable classes.

Last I checked these were basic principles of software engineering. I'm not quite sure why people are still opposed to the clean up. Although as an alternative, if we remove the downstream code that uses this feature then it can simply be deleted instead of simplified...

« Back to merge proposal