Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/move

Revision history for this message
Alan Griffiths (alan-griffiths) wrote :

220 - typedef uint32_t ValueType;
221 + typedef int ValueType;

(and related uint_32 -> int changes)

While these changes fix the problem mentioned here, I imagine that there was a reason for choosing uint32_t, and that this change could have unintended consequences. Has this been checked?

review: Needs Information

« Back to merge proposal