Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/managed-surface

  1. managed-surface
  2. Merge into development-branch
Revision history for this message
Robert Carr (robertcarr) wrote :

>> For example, we still need SurfaceWrapper (or something like it) to attach state to each surface
>> from a bespoke shell, without needing external containers.

I prefer this sentence backwards.

"For example, we still need a hash table (or something like it) to attach state to each surface from
 a bespoke shell, without needing surface wrappers"

review: Disapprove
Reply

« Back to merge proposal