Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/judder

Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

I disagree that adding a fake display is more elegant than dropping frames after a timeout; the former is a hack, the latter is a direct implementation of the conceptual behaviour we desire.

I suspect that the 1Hz branch will be safer over time as code changes; it implements the client behaviour we care about in the code that implements client behaviour, rather than as a side-effect of the default compositor.

Hm. How does this interact with the Qt scenegraph thingy? Isn't that replacing the compositor?

That said, it might well be that this is safer than the 1Hz branch *right now*.

« Back to merge proposal