I understand. Aside from longer execution times, it creates the risk of spurious failures. On the other hand, testing code in its "natural environment" without mocking (where you can) is arguably better practice.
Also, the test in question was already timing-dependent.
Alan,
I understand. Aside from longer execution times, it creates the risk of spurious failures. On the other hand, testing code in its "natural environment" without mocking (where you can) is arguably better practice.
Also, the test in question was already timing-dependent.