Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/fix-1493721
Revision history for this message
| Alan Griffiths (alan-griffiths) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
> It was required at the time to fix apparent expectation leakage between
> successive tests. But seemingly isn't needed today.
Whatever happened I think you misinterpreted it. The test object is torn down and destructed after each test (and that verifies the expectations). Could you have been seeing a race between satisfying the expectation and the tear down and destruction of the test object?