Mir

Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/mir/bypass

Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

Alexandros,

1. Pure virtual: Disagree
"Consistency" in this case would just produce unreachable and confusing code. It would increase code bloat, reduce test coverage and likely confuse anyone reading it.

2. last_flipped_bypass_buf: Fixed with a comment

3. Ugly casting: Fixed as you suggested

4. Tconst&: Disagree
I've been using "const T&" ever since I raised the issue;
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/mir-devel/2013-April/000098.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/mir-devel/2013-April/000106.html
I hoped that others would follow, but the conversation went quiet.

« Back to merge proposal